Plagiarism keeps everyone happy, but…

An editorial in The Hindu today started my day with a question: How do we avoid plagiarism in institutions? The question haunted me for about an year by now. I came to college with long thoughts about this. Especially, that some universities promote “open book  examination” and yet they manage to weed out plagiarism; but how is the question that remained. I conducted an exam today, open book one, to see how my students respond to this. Just like I thought, not wanted, they gave me copied answers, word to word. It felt as if there was no real value addition, but then all that a teacher can do is limited to suggesting and directing–persuasion is an option sometimes. So, I did suggest that plagiarism is in a way limiting their imaginative abilities, and that they can get away from this habit by trying to paraphrase to begin with. I thought I had made a reasonable step forward.

But then some piece of information gives me a hint that plagiarism prevails in the institution even in teaching! Wohoo! I am not talking about information sharing, intellectually stimulating discussions, or teaching methodology, but I am talking about “getting to know what happens in other class through students, and then repeating the same in some other class“. Hmm! Honestly, I appreciate it at some level, because one person works for his class, and the students of some other class also benefit from it. At least, its worth was well recognized because some other teacher copied it; only there is no ownership, and only there is no imagination any further. I sometimes pity the students who become instruments of such teachers as to assisting them information about other teachers/classes (a culture I came running away from). They do not understand that they are hurting the system by doing things that are not their job.

Any explanation I offer now seems to me of little use, because of the happy climate that prevails. I understand, plagiarism is keeping everyone happy, including me though I am copied. But then, the question that started my day still follows… How do we get rid of it? Academics can be lot better without plagiarism, but how do we convince the stakeholders? Any more ideas…

Secretary or Satan?

Sometimes, I blog to vent my fumes. Today is one such occasion. Even more, this is the second time in less than a month, I am having to vent because of the same person. On the first occasion, as to my original way of learning, I saw that person as of different type. But as I am learning more, I realize that the difference she brings is more satanic.  And after today, I consider her as having done one too many irritating deeds.

Don’t mistake me as complaining on my boss; because this time around,  it is the department’s junior assistant who is creating trouble. To me, it seems as though she has got control on my time table. Whenever I meet her, not only do I end up getting bullshit (suggestions and looks-through-lens), but I am also being dictated on my priorities. Now, let me remind–this is the JUNIOR ASSISTANT. Sometimes, it is worthwhile to remind people of where they are, and what they are supposed to do.

Of a lot of things that she has done to cause my expression in this post, here are a few you might enjoy: Continue reading

The Laughable and The Uninspiring

Series of incidents since yesterday–I can’t resist sharing them here.

I received a call from a professor yesterday. She asked me if I knew what I should be doing today. Frankly, I did not know what she was referring to. But she told me that she told me what I had to do long back. I know I have a little problem with my memory in general, but my memory works efficiently when it deals with work. Fundamentally, that call asserted that I did not keep track of what I had to do. The reason behind that professor’s such forceful assertion–I guess or may be I felt–was to escape from that activity if I said I was not available, putting the blame on me, a scapegoat in the bottom of the hierarchy.

Lesson: It is easy to blame someone’s memory as poor, and hence him/her. Any argument to defend can be made to sound foolish if you are in the bottom of the pile. In how many movies have we seen tactics of the crooked to convince the society that who is innocent is actually mad.

In the course of a discussion with another professor, I got to know one of her experiences. One of her friends, who often keeps calling her, had one day called to share a happy news that he was awarded the ‘Best Teacher’ in his University. But the sad part of his story was longer; in that, his kid was being counseled by this professor for psychological reasons. And more painfully, his wife claimed that her husband uses lots of ‘psychological stuff’ on their kid, so that the kid does not have any problem. Now, this professor has an experience, and her friend has an award.

Lesson: Best outside, Worst inside does not really work that way. It ends up becoming a story!

I visited another professor at her residence after a long time. Just before I entered her residence, there stood a kid who asked me for a little help. He asked me if there were any doctors available in the surrounding area. I told him, I was going to meet one. But just before entering the professor’s residence was when it lit up in my mind that he might be referring to a medical doctor.

Lesson: Knowledge is a curse. It only confuses!

After that little fun in the last paragraph of this post, I have to reveal the activity that we were expected to do at Andhra University. A professor and me, a research scholar, were sent to that university where their admissions counseling was going on, to distribute pamphlets promoting admissions in our university. Just imagine having to make a first impression to a prospective student distributing pamphlets on road, and then presenting yourself as a faculty in the college! This happens only in my college, I guess. This act of our college best represents what they usually do, create paradoxes and argue their case. Here, it was a conflict they created between having ‘dignity of labor’ and having ‘self-respect’. If I were to argue that my being a faculty needs that I follow certain standard of living, then they would push the case to ‘dignity of labor’ side. If they read this post, then they might be cautious in pushing the argument to ‘sophistication’, suggesting that being a faculty and distributing pamphlets on road can be managed. The university may not know that a clerk of our college was hesitating to do the job that was given to us, but they speak management and run an institution. Let me end this post with just this case, before I am tempted to roll out too many!

Lesson: There is always a conflict when fools rule, to compromise or to challenge. But seldom, there is a choice. And life offers what?! May be more jaw-dropping questions, for which answering would make you feel insulted.

Life is really fascinating, and I mean it!

Don’t forget contributing to World Food Program. :)