<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Keep it simple.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vinaychaganti.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vinaychaganti.org</link>
	<description>Because life is fascinating!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do I start, I wonder&#8230; by Sai</title>
		<link>http://vinaychaganti.org/2013/05/09/how-do-i-start-i-wonder/comment-page-1/#comment-7385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinaychaganti.org/?p=4344#comment-7385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you wait for someone&#039;s permission or divine intervention, you&#039;ll never start. Just write..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you wait for someone&#8217;s permission or divine intervention, you&#8217;ll never start. Just write..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a good theory? by indiskinorge</title>
		<link>http://vinaychaganti.org/2013/03/04/what-is-a-good-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-7244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[indiskinorge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinaychaganti.org/?p=4330#comment-7244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article on Sci Am has lots more to it than what meets the eye. It is a carefully written one (I ahve read others which use a more dry and circumspect language in brutally presenting facts and figures in support and otherwise) which deeply inquires about causal relationships when isolated from other competing external influences. I would take a stance and say that it has arguments in support and some of the limitations have also been covered. I wouldn’t say it is good theory or bad theory. I am simply not qualified to say so. It is normative and at the same time relative in comparison. However, I still state that it contributes towards theory building and in opening up several studies that either confirm or disconfirm the evidence, adding to the body of knowledge and research.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article on Sci Am has lots more to it than what meets the eye. It is a carefully written one (I ahve read others which use a more dry and circumspect language in brutally presenting facts and figures in support and otherwise) which deeply inquires about causal relationships when isolated from other competing external influences. I would take a stance and say that it has arguments in support and some of the limitations have also been covered. I wouldn’t say it is good theory or bad theory. I am simply not qualified to say so. It is normative and at the same time relative in comparison. However, I still state that it contributes towards theory building and in opening up several studies that either confirm or disconfirm the evidence, adding to the body of knowledge and research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a good theory? by Vinay Chaganti</title>
		<link>http://vinaychaganti.org/2013/03/04/what-is-a-good-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vinay Chaganti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinaychaganti.org/?p=4330#comment-7241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will come to all that. I just wanted to keep things simple. :) Hence this short post. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will come to all that. I just wanted to keep things simple. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Hence this short post. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is a good theory? by Santosh Sali</title>
		<link>http://vinaychaganti.org/2013/03/04/what-is-a-good-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-7240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Santosh Sali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 08:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vinaychaganti.org/?p=4330#comment-7240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They say that there is nothing as practical as a good theory. (Kurt Lewin).

Do you mean to say that if there is no &quot;Causal&quot; relationship , then there is no theory ?  what if there is only association (What most of OB/OT theories are...) ?  
Also what about the falsifiability ? Article points out that it is hallmark of good theory. (http://www.www.aom.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/AMR/VandeVenNothing.pdf) ..

By the way Article is very good and it is really good that we are discussing theory building on such forums.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say that there is nothing as practical as a good theory. (Kurt Lewin).</p>
<p>Do you mean to say that if there is no &#8220;Causal&#8221; relationship , then there is no theory ?  what if there is only association (What most of OB/OT theories are&#8230;) ?<br />
Also what about the falsifiability ? Article points out that it is hallmark of good theory. (<a href="http://www.www.aom.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/AMR/VandeVenNothing.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.www.aom.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/AMR/VandeVenNothing.pdf</a>) ..</p>
<p>By the way Article is very good and it is really good that we are discussing theory building on such forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>